http://in.rediff.com/cricket/2006/jun/14icc.htm
Just came across this intersting story, and was amazed to look at the lengths ICC is going to defend Lara's frustration.
The article says:
According to this protocol, when a batsman hits the ball in the air to a fielder near the boundary and the on-field umpires are uncertain whether a catch has been completed or a boundary scored, the on-field umpires are entitled to refer the boundary decision to the TV umpire in accordance with Clause 3.2.4 of the ICC Playing Conditions. Once the boundary decision request has been referred to him, the TV umpire has the responsibility to make a decision solely on whether a boundary has been scored, the release said.
If the TV replay evidence is inconclusive, the TV umpire must still make a boundary decision. His decision must be made using the existing convention in cricket which dictates that the status quo prevails -- ie, because no evidence exists of a boundary being scored, no boundary is awarded.
This decision is conveyed back to the on-field umpires. In these circumstances, as no boundary has been scored, the only decision left is for the on-field umpire at the bowler's end to give the batsman out -- caught it added.
Now, what I have always believed is: "Benefit of doubt should be given to batsman"
This means if you are uncertain on whether boundary is scored or not then you are doubtful about batsman's dismissal. And if you are doubtful about batsman's dismissal, then he should be given NOT OUT.
Should not it be a simple case of verifying if the fielder has completed the catch?
Clause 3.2.3.1 says:
a. Should the bowler’s end umpire be unable to decide whether or not a catch was taken cleanly, he shall first consult with the square leg umpire.
b Should both umpires be unable to make a decision, a not out decision shall be given by the bowler’s end umpire. Only if the line of vision of both umpires is obscured shall the bowler’s end umpire be entitled to refer the decision to the third umpire
What more can one say? Its there for everyone to see.
